Bugs & Docs Improvements 🔥

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - also the Sync User example, where my own user has no email, first, or last name set, shows like this: ```newUser := models.NewUserCreate("jlangevin") newUser.SetEmail("undefined") newUser.SetFirstName("undefined") newUser.SetLastName("undefined")``` :sweat_smile: User - jlangevin Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C02TVG7RY1X/p1734717664974769?thread_ts=1734717154.590689&cid=C02TVG7RY1X

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - I'll update the doc with an explanation User - thomas095 Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C02TVG7RY1X/p1734717381008169?thread_ts=1734717154.590689&cid=C02TVG7RY1X

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - CC: @g.e.manor / @filip - I think it’s time we add a guide specifically for machine identities, and API-keys in particular User - or Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C02RTML2WNN/p1734623634695519?thread_ts=1734623350.969749&cid=C02RTML2WNN

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - See https://github.com/permitio/opal/blob/6dbba8f26997343caf4b9aeb234e775c29982408/packages/opal-server/opal_server/config.py#L50 User - or Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C01RUUYV3TP/p1733415886473949?thread_ts=1733414651.400089&cid=C01RUUYV3TP

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - @maya,not found relevant docs for build the customized images for the OPAL-client, OPAL-server from the source code .., User - rambabu_keshetti Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C01RUUYV3TP/p1713436309408889?thread_ts=1713269273.189639&cid=C01RUUYV3TP

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - @maya,not found relevant docs for build the customized images for the OPAL-client, OPAL-server from the source code .., User - rambabu_keshetti Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C01RUUYV3TP/p1713436309408889?thread_ts=1713269273.189639&cid=C01RUUYV3TP

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - Yes on RBAC and ABAC policies we usually see eub 10ms on p99 for single queries. Memory and CPU allocation are of course a factor as well. What you are describing for a bulk check sounds reasonable. Keep in mind OPA is single threaded and bulk checks are still sequential in evaluation. User - or Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C06Q8BYK8LE/p1712310315024579?thread_ts=1712310007.205609&cid=C06Q8BYK8LE

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - If you need to optimize bulk queries that can be done rather easily with a multi OPA process PDP or a cluster of pdps behind a load balancer User - or Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C06Q8BYK8LE/p1712310405843939?thread_ts=1712310007.205609&cid=C06Q8BYK8LE

This was auto-generated by a Slack integration. Message text - Yes, but while remaining in eventual consistency. As part of the OPAL architecture policy decision points get notified of changes to data/policy even before they get the actual content of these changes. These updates which are propagated via the lightweight pub/sub channel are extremely fast, and would be de-facto real time for almost any system (besides perhpas algo-trading speeds). PDPs are able to delay decisions, or deny decisions based on the knowledge of inconsistency - these are reflected in both PDP healthchecks and internal state User - or Link to message - https://permit-io.slack.com/archives/C02TVG7RY1X/p1712300327271689?thread_ts=1712280390.717689&cid=C02TVG7RY1X